0去购物车结算
购物车中还没有商品，赶紧选购吧！
当前位置: 图书分类 > 社科/经管/语言/法律 > 语言学 > 外国语言学 > 结构启动及第二语言语法构式学习：以中国学习者产出英语双及物构式为例

相同语种的商品

相同作者的商品

销售排行榜

浏览历史

结构启动及第二语言语法构式学习：以中国学习者产出英语双及物构式为例


联系编辑
 
标题：
 
内容：
 
联系方式：
 
  
结构启动及第二语言语法构式学习：以中国学习者产出英语双及物构式为例
  • 电子书不支持下载，仅供在线阅读
  • 书号：9787030368454
    作者：王敏
  • 外文书名：Structural Priming and L2 Learning of Grammar Constructions:Evidence from L2 Production of English Dative Constructions by Chinese EFL Learners
  • 装帧：平脊精装
    开本：A5
  • 页数：324
    字数：420
    语种：eng
  • 出版社：科学出版社
    出版时间：2015/2/27
  • 所属分类：文化
  • 定价： ￥78.00元
    售价： ￥61.62元
  • 图书介质:
    按需印刷 电子书

  • 购买数量： 件  可供
  • 商品总价：

相同系列
全选

内容介绍

样章试读

用户评论

全部咨询

　　This book aims to investigate structural priming in L2 learners with a focus on Chinese College-level EFL(English as a Foreign Language)learners’ production of English dative constructions. Specifically,it is intended to address three issues: 1)whether structural priming occurs in L2 production; 2)whether L2 structural priming has a long-term effect and consequently affects the pattern of subsequent production of syntactic constructions; and 3)whether and to what extent the short-term and the long-term effect of L2 structural priming are mediated by linguistic and psycholinguistic factors. The overarching goal of the present study is to explore whether and under what conditions structural priming has a role to play in L2 learning of grammar constructions,thereby enriching our understanding of the psycholinguistic process involved in L2 learning. For this purpose,four empirical st udies were conduct ed. 　　Experiments 1 and 2 were designed to probe the short-term effect of structural priming,that is,whether structural priming occurs when the prime sentence immediately precedes the target sentence. One hundred and thirty-two Chinese EFL learners who represented two English proficiency levels(intermediate vs. advanced)participated in the experiments,72 for Experiment 1 and 60 for Experiment 2. Experiment 1 employed a written sentence completion task whereas Experiment 2 a spoken picture description task. The results show that structural priming did occur with both the prepositional dative(PD)and the double object dative(DO)constructions,and that the L2 learners,regardless of their language proficiency,were more likely to reuse a particular construction(PD/DO)in the target responses if it had been previously produced in the prime sentences. Moreover,the magnitude of structural priming was found to be modulated by L2 proficiency. The advanced learners exhibited stronger priming effects for the DO construction than their intermediate counterparts. However,no evidence was obtained for the proficiency effect on the priming of the PD construction. Furthermore,the priming effects gave rise to between-verb variations. That is,verbs which are more strongly associated with a construction were more likely to be primed into the construction and resist the priming of the alternative construction. In addition,the results derived from Experiment 1 were basically consistent with those from Experiment 2,in spite of the employment of different tasks in the two experiments. This suggests that syntactic priming in L2 production is robust and reliable rather than task-specific. Of interest is that,compared with the sentence completion task,the priming effects in the picture description task were stronger. 　　Experiments 3 and 4 investigated the long-term effect of structural priming in L2 production by means of written sentence completion tasks. In the first part of each experiment,learners’ experience of producing the PD and DO constructions was manipulated in ways that enabled them to produce a particular proportion of PD and DO constructions. Then the learners were given the opportunity to produce either the PD or DO construction without being provided with further primes. The experiments yielded four major findings. Firstly,syntactic priming in L2 production has produced a long-term effect. The L2 learners’ experience of producing the DO construction earlier in the experiment increased the rates at which the construction was produced later in the experiment compared with the baseline condition. Nevertheless,there is a lack of evidence for the long-term priming effect on the production of the PD construction. Secondly,the long-term priming effect is modulated by the relative frequency with which each construction is produced earlier in the experiment. It turned out that the experience strongly skewed towards the DO construction significantly increased the likelihood of producing the construction and at the same time suppressed the production of the competing PD construction. Thirdly,the frequency effect on the subsequent production of the dative constructions persists even across the changing tasks. Finally,the long-term effect is insusceptible to the temporary distribution of the tokens of each construction within the experiment. 　　The findings of the present study have empirically verified the occurrence of structural priming in L2 production and confirmed its potentially beneficial role in L2 learning of grammar constructions. More generally,the findings suggest that the implicit learning from usage accentuated by the usage-based theories is also operative in L2 acquisition.
样章试读
  • 暂时还没有任何用户评论
总计 0 个记录，共 1 页。 第一页 上一页 下一页 最末页

全部咨询(共0条问答)

  • 暂时还没有任何用户咨询内容
总计 0 个记录，共 1 页。 第一页 上一页 下一页 最末页
用户名： 匿名用户
E-mail：
咨询内容：

目录

  • Contents
    序
    前言
    Abstract
    Acknowledgements
    Chapter 1 Introduction
    1.1 Research Orientation
    1.2 Structural Priming:The Target of Research
    1.3 Rationale
    1.3.1 Theoretical Values
    1.3.2 Pedagogical and Methodological Values
    1.4 Key Research Questions
    1.5 Structure of the Book
    Chapter 2 L2 Learning of Grammar Constructions:A Usagebased Perspective
    2.1 Defining the Usage-based Model
    2.2 Constructions
    2.2.1 What Is Construction?
    2.2.2 Construction as a Prototype Category
    2.2.3 Schematization and Entrenchment
    2.2.4 Type Frequency vs. Token Frequency
    2.3 The Usage-based Perspe+ctive of Construction Learning
    2.3.1 Associative Learning Mechanisms
    2.3.2 The Connectionist Models
    2.3.3 L1 Acquisition vis-à-vis L2 Acquisition
    2.4 Problems with the Usage-based Perspective of SLA
    2.5 Summary
    Chapter 3 Syntactic Priming and Language Learning
    3.1 An Overview of Syntactic Priming
    3.1.1 Representational Underpinning of Syntactic Priming
    3.1.2 Techniques in Syntactic Priming Research
    3.2 Mechanisms of Syntactic Priming
    3.2.1 The Activation Account
    3.2.2 Syntactic Priming as a Form of Implicit Learning
    3.2.3 Strengthening of Message-to-syntax Mappings
    3.3 Constraints on Syntactic Priming Effects
    3.3.1 Constraints on Short-term Effects
    3.3.2 Constraints on Long-term Effects
    3.4 Application of Syntactic Priming to Language Acquisition
    3.4.1 Syntactic Priming in Children
    3.4.2 Syntactic Priming in L2 Learners
    3.5 Summary
    Chapter 4 Exploring Syntactic Priming in L2 Production:Issues and Predictions
    4.1 Target Structure of the Study:English Dative Constructions
    4.1.1 A Sketch of English Dative Constructions
    4.1.2 Constraints on Dative Alternation
    4.1.3 Interaction between Verbs and Constructions
    4.1.4 A Contrastive Analysis of English and Chinese Dative Constructions
    4.1.5 Empirical SLA Studies on Dative Alternation
    4.2 Synthesizing Syntactic Priming with L2 Learning of Grammar Constructions
    4.3 Issues and Predictions Concerning Syntactic Priming in L2 Production
    4.3.1 Possibility of the Occurrence of Syntactic Priming in L2 Production
    4.3.2 Factors Constraining the Short-term Effect of Syntactic Priming
    4.4 Persistence of Syntactic Priming in L2 Production
    4.4.1 The Long-term Effect of Syntactic Priming
    4.4.2 Factors Affecting the Long-term Effect
    4.5 Research Questions and Hypotheses
    4.6 Summary
    Chapter 5 Syntactic Priming in L2 Learners
    5.1 Experiment 1
    5.1.1 Method
    5.1.2 Results and Discussion
    5.2 Experiment 2
    5.2.1 Method
    5.2.2 Results and Discussion
    5.2.3 An Omnibus Analysis of Experiments 1 and 2
    5.3 Experiment 3
    5.3.1 Method
    5.3.2 Results and Discussion
    5.4 Experiment 4
    5.4.1 Method
    5.4.2 Results and Discussion
    5.5 Summary
    Chapter 6 General Discussion and Conclusions
    6.1 Characterizing Syntactic Priming in L2 Production
    6.1.1 Short-term Effect of Syntactic Priming
    6.1.2 Influences on the Short-term Effect
    6.1.3 The Long-term Effect of Syntactic Priming
    6.2 Conclusions
    6.2.1 A Recapitulation of Major Findings
    6.2.2 Implications for L2 Pedagogy
    6.2.3 Limitations of the Current Study and Directions for Further Research
    References
    Appendix 1 Stimuli Used in Experiment 1
    Appendix 2 Primes Used in Experiment 2
    Appendix 3 Samples of the Pictures Used in Experiment 2
    Appendix 4 Stimuli Used in Experiments 3 and 4
    List of Figures
    Figure 2.1 Linguistic Constructions in the Complexity/Schematicity Continuum―Adapted from Roehr(2005)
    Figure 5.1 Production of Targets by Prime
    Figure 5.2 Interaction between Prime Type and Target for the Intermediate Group
    Figure 5.3 Interaction between Prime Type and Target for the Advanced Group
    Figure 5.4 Production of DO Target by Verb in the Baseline
    Figure 5.5 Production of DO Targets in Each Prime Condition by Verb(for Intermediates)
    Figure 5.6 Production of DO Targets in Each Prime Condition by Verb(for Advanced Learners)
    Figure 5.7 The Sequence of the Events in the Picture Description Task
    Figure 5.8 Production of Targets by Prime Type
    Figure 5.9 Interaction as a Function of Prime Type^* Target for the Intermediate Group
    Figure 5.10 Interaction as a Function of Prime Type^* Target for the Advanced Group
    Figure 5.11 Interaction of Prime Type by Proficiency Level on the Production of DO Target
    Figure 5.12 Interaction of Prime Type by Proficiency Level on the Production of PD Target
    Figure 5.13 Production of DO Target as a Function of Prime Type^* Task
    Figure 5.14 Production of PD Target as a Function of Prime Type^* Task
    Figure 5.15 Production of Targets in the Priming Phase by Exposure Condition
    Figure 5.16 Production of Targets by Production Phase
    List of Tables
    Table 2.1 English Argument Structure Constructions
    Table 3.1 Summary of L2 Syntactic priming Studies Targeting Dative Constructions
    Table 4.1 Examples of Force-dynamic Relation
    Table 4.2 Classification of Verbs according to the Semantic Compatibility
    Table 4.3 Collexemes Distinguishing between the Ditransitive and the To-dative
    Table 4.4 Test Verbs of the Present Study
    Table 5.1 Grouping of Participants Based on Years of L2 English Learning and Scores on English Proficiency Test
    Table 5.2 Frequencies of Occurrence of Responses in the Prime Conditions
    Table 5.3 Mean Proportions of Targets by Prime^* Proficiency Level
    Table 5.4 Results of the Mixed Repeated Measures MANOVA
    Table 5.5 Pairwise Comparisons of the Mean Proportions of Targets by Prime Type
    Table 5.6 Effect of Prime Type^* Proficiency Level on the Production of DO and PD Targets
    Table 5.7 Pairwise Comparisons of the Means of Targets by Prime Type^* Proficiency Level
    Table 5.8 Pairwise Comparisons of Relative Proportions of Targets by Prime Type
    Table 5.9 Pairwise Comparisons of the Means of Targets as a Function of Proficiency Level
    Table 5.10 Pairwise Comparisons of OT Targets between the Prime Conditions
    Table 5.11 Production of Targets by Verb in the Baseline Condition
    Table 5.12 Exemplification of the Null Hypothesis H_0
    Table 5.13 Observed vs. Expected Frequencies for Verbs as a Function of Prime Type
    Table 5.14 Grouping of Participants Based on Years of L2 English Learning and Scores on English Proficiency Test
    Table 5.15 Frequencies of Each Type of Responses by Prime Condition^* Proficiency Level
    Table 5.16 Production of Targets as a Function of Prime Type^* Proficiency Level
    Table 5.17 Results of the Mixed Repeated Measures ANOVA
    Table 5.18 Pairwise Comparisons of the Mean Proportions of Targets by Prime Type
    Table 5.19 Pairwise Comparisons of Relative Proportions of Targets by Prime Type
    Table 5.20 Summary of Results for an Omnibus Analysis of Experiments 1 and 2
    Table 5.21 Design Structure for Experiment 3
    Table 5.22 Raw Frequencies of Targets of Each Category
    Table 5.23 Means of Targets as a Function of Production Phase^* Exposure Condition
    Table 5.24 Pairwise Comparisons of Targets by Production Phase
    Table 5.25 Results of the MONOVA Test on the Production of PD and DO Targets in the Priming Phase as a Function of Exposure Condition
    Table 5.26 Post hoc Tests of the Effect of Exposure Condition(Tukey)on the Production of PD and DO Targets in the Priming Phase
    Table 5.27 Pairwise Comparisons of the Means of PD and DO Targets in Each Exposure Condition
    Table 5.28 Production of Targets as a Function of Exposure Condition^* Production Phase
    Table 5.29 Results of the MANOVA Test on the Production of DO and PD Targets as a Function of Exposure Condition
    Table 6.1 Production of DO Targets Following DO Primes by Trials
帮助中心
公司简介
联系我们
常见问题
新手上路
发票制度
积分说明
购物指南
配送方式
配送时间及费用
配送查询说明
配送范围
快递查询
售后服务
退换货说明
退换货流程
投诉或建议
版权声明
经营资质
营业执照
出版社经营许可证

中国科技出版传媒股份有限公司　版权所有

　

京ICP备14028887号-5　 京ICP证150976号 京公网安备 11010102004214号

北京东黄城根北街16号 邮编：100717 Email:webmaster@mail.sciencep.com